🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an event that began as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has adopted a commercial tone, growing to encompass functions where African descendants are remunerated to speak with predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The tide has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the UK, Deutschland, Éire and the Holland.

The month has developed since that time, placing less emphasis on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the way the celebration is observed is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to tackle systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the warmer months we observed the largest far-right rally in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator feels empowered to declare that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, far-right parties are expanding in Europe as a whole.

In the America, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, often successfully, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to erase African American heritage and experience from the records is under way. One of the political figure's first executive orders aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the month represents how little it can be impactful if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content celebrations of historical achievements, rather than addressing the conditions of the present. It also shows how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. A university professor, a professor at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just eliminate things like Black History Month altogether, believing they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an era that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an foundation that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed through the year (as certain organizations are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not avoid political issues, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What purpose serves simple recognition of the bygone era when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Establishments who observe it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and awareness of subtle slights, but faced with the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and reactive. It could be that an complete renaming is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.