🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive policy to restrict social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a rising chorus of states are considering parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that phones and networks are "taking away our children's childhood". Legislation may be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "an measures on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to approve a law lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a comparable step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised parents to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a symbolic motion calling for a ban for minors without parental consent is provided. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the move does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a solid starting point," stated one MEP driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in robust research".

Last year, interest gathered behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. One foundation established by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after being exposed to disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for minors," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, regulation is largely unfolding at the local level amid federal inaction.

• Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law restricting teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with extra use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed bills demanding parental consent for minors to set up social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from various politicians to copy Australia's path, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, additional countries are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, global agencies adopt a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even backfire". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

While this international debate evolves, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that policymakers internationally are increasingly content to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.